Week Three The nuclear power bill, HF 561, is a one-sided effort by MidAmerican Energy to have their customers take all the financial risk to build an unneeded nuclear power plant. Even with an amendment that proponents are calling a major improvement, the legislation is a bad deal and would result in higher bills for consumers and businesses even in the event a plant never produces any power. Even the Iowa Utilities Board, which usually does what the big utilities want, has suggested the amendment is trouble. Unfortunately, the hugely unpopular bill was voted out of sub-committee on Thursday and will go to the Senate Commerce Committee next week. I will be spending considerable time working again to stop this legislation. Here is a news article on the debate. The so-called ag-gag bill, HF 589, is unnecessary. It tries to address the concerns of agricultural interests to prevent the public from seeing abuses of animals that might happen in their facilities. There are already laws that exist to prevent trespassing from people that seek unlawful access to confinement facilities. Animal welfare and food safety are of great concern to consumers. Preventing consumers from having confidence in how their food is produced is a mistake. I will oppose this legislation. On Tuesday, Peter Fisher from the Iowa Policy Project came to the Senate Ways & Means Committee meeting to present his report, “Tax Increment Financing: A Case Study of Johnson County” (click here for the report). Committee members had really good questions, and we had a good discussion. Also on Tuesday, I participated in the League of Cities Legislative Day. I was on a panel to answer questions about property taxes and TIF. My colleagues Senator Feenstra, Representative Tom Sands and Representative Dave Jacoby joined me to discuss these issues on the panel. I met with Governor Branstad on Tuesday to discuss the Senate’s bi-partisan commercial property tax plan. I explained the Senate’s bill, and we discussed trying to get on the same page. The Governor still likes his plan a lot. The Senate really likes the Senate plan too! There is an article in the Cedar Rapids Gazette that discusses the issue (Click here to read the article). On Wednesday, I met with the elected and city leaders from the City of Des Moines to discuss their use of TIF. We had a very good discussion about what is working and some ideas on making TIF work even better. On Thursday, Kirkwood Community College students visited the Capitol. We had a good discussion about ways to keep our community colleges strong. Also on Thursday morning, the Legislative Interim Committee received three mental health redesign bill drafts for review. Here is a link to download PDF versions of the DRAFT bills. Johnson County Task Force on Aging – Director Palmer - TODAY – 2:00 pm LWV Legislative Forum: Saturday, January 28 - TOMORROW TIF Reform Ideas from the Community Forum 1. No open ended TIFs: The revenue diversion ends when project finance obligations end. 2. Put teeth in Anti-piracy provisions to ban the use of TIFs to entice employers and jobs from one Iowa location to another. 3. Require job creation and/or job retention impact statement of all new TIF’s. 4. Increase state oversight of TIF’s. Require the Iowa Economic Development Authority to review the economic impact of the proposed TIFs. For example, required that the project be shown to expand the property tax base of the state and show a financial need before granting approval. 5. Limit a city’s TIF debt to no more than a specific percentage of that city’s taxable value. 6. Require “But For” analysis on all TIF proposals 7. Restrict a city’s TIF income to no more than a specific percentage of that city’s regular property tax income. Thank you to everyone that participated in the TIF meetings! They were quite helpful to me in developing a clearer understanding of the issue and some ideas for fixing TIF. Visitors to the Capitol TIF Reform Ideas continued 9. Limit economic development TIFs to 10 years (a five year extension if the county approves). 10. Expand the state and local reporting requirements and transparency. 11. Ban TIFs for residential and retail development, with limited exceptions for the redevelopment of existing commercial properties. 12. TIF only for economic development. No TIFs for city halls, fire stations, rec centers, equipment vehicles or salaries. 13. Tighten definition of slum and blight TIFs and limit them 10, 15, or 20 years. 14. Ban retail TIFs 15. Prevent residential value from being included in a TIF increment and phase-out existing residential TIF’s. 16. Allow schools/county a voice in TIF decision if they disagree with proposal, allow a cap on TIF. 17. Allow schools and county an opt out option on TIF 18. Tighten definition of what constitutes slum and blight. 19. Allow schools to opt out of TIF. 20. TIF proposal must be consistent with Comprehensive Plan. 21. Stricter state policy on use of TIFs 22. Do not allow tax rebates/abatements 23. Allow residential TIFs with some restrictions 25. Allow rebates with some restrictions. 26. Require County-wide comprehensive financial plan. 27. Ban TIFs for residential value from being included in a TIF increment and phase out existing residential TIFs AND add low and moderate income property. 28. Encourage cities to use other financing tools. 29. Limiting TIFed areas to a certain percentage of a city. 30. Don’t allow a TIFed area to include more than one school district. 31. All TIF debt should come be considered general obligation debt. 32. Allow project only TIFs. 33. If taxes don’t cover debt service, developer owes money/pays taxes. 34. Be careful about placing limitations on residential and retail TIFs. 35. If retails TIF is wanted, TIF at initial base amount. 36. Examine money being taken away from the schools. Keep more dollars in schools 37. Evaluate with caution regarding smaller vs. larger towns. 38. Require analysis of whether a project would take place without TIF. 39. Code word KISS (keep it simple stupid) Prioritize 40. Make bonding more enticing to local entities. Consider lowering the threshold to 50 % voter approval. 41. Analysis of cost benefits taxes lost vs. revenues in 42. Pinpoint changes to biggest abuses. Maintain flexibility 43. Look at how a project is done, and how it fits into a community 44. Cities should not be landlords TIF in the news! News you can use eFiling your taxes gets your return quicker Avoid tax refund anticipation loans & checks Community grants for beautification Through April 2, Keep Iowa Beautiful is accepting applications for their 2012 Community Beautification Grant Program. This program is designed for communities of less than 5,000 that wish to implement beautification projects. Applications and complete details are available at www.keepiowabeautiful.com/kib-beautification-grant.cfm. Apply for water improvement grants 2012 Iowa travel guide available How to Contact Me Joe Bolkcom 728 2nd Avenue Iowa City, IA 52245 319.337.6280 joe.bolkcom@legis.state.ia.us joe@joebolkcom.org www.joebolkcom.org www.senate.iowa.gov/bolkcom www.legis.state.ia.us About The Networker The Networker provides brief summaries of some of the things that I am working on, the work of the General Assembly, and political perspectives on issues. I also use it to announce meetings and how to find useful information about state government. Additional information Senator Joe Bolkcom is an Assistant Majority Leader and chair of the Ways & Means Committee. He also serves on the Appropriations, Commerce, Environment & Energy Independence, Human Resources, and Natural Resources committees. |